Before you proceed with the activity you should have discussed how to proceed with your group from the previous lesson activity.
- Discuss with your group members how you will show accountability to each other. Note the wiki peer assessment rubric below.
- Log in to the course wiki and open the pages that have been named according to your topic.
-
Publish your reviews and recommendations. Make sure you are accountable to your group.
- Use the wiki peer assessment rubric below to assess your peers. Submit your assessment of each team member, in a document, to your tutor.
Your group will be assessed for the product in the wiki and each group member will be awarded that mark multiplied by the average peer assessment mark. For example if the peer assessment mark is 2 and your wiki publication receives a 6, your final mark for this activity will be 6×2=12.
Wiki Peer Assessment
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Does not follow through on most assigned tasks and depends on others to do the work. | Follows through on most assigned tasks but does not show full responsibility. | Follows through on assigned tasks and does not depend on others to do the work, shows full responsibility for tasks assigned. |
Wiki publication assessment
| 0-1 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 8-10 |
| The work is not original and very plainly presented. | The work lacks originality and/or is presented with little attention to presentation. | The work is original and clearly presented in an interesting way. | The work is original and very creatively presented. |
| 0-1 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 8-10 |
| The depth of useful knowledge shared is minimal. | The depth of useful knowledge shared is inadequate and there are significant omissions. | The depth of useful knowledge shared is adequate enough for the page to be informative. | The depth of useful knowledge shared is remarkable, with great attention paid to detail. |
Once you have completed your publication, submitted your peer assessment and your tutor has recorded this, you will be able to continue to the next lesson topic.
